If you know anything about buying social media votes, then you're sure to have heard the name uSocial who are probably the web's most well-known social bookmarking marketer. In this short article I'm going to share my experiences with them and if you should be using them at all.
One of the main benefits of using uSocial over any of their competitors is simply that they discount their packs of votes depending on how many you buy -- the more purchased, the more you'll save. At the time of this writing, all of their competitors offered a flat rate no matter how many were purchased, meaning cost could soar for large campaigns.
Unlike a few of their competitors who are simply misleading when they guarantee you a front-page listing on Digg or another site (which is impossible due to the fact they'd need to control Digg's systems to do so), uSocial offer a votes guarantee and actually state their success rate of getting to the front page honestly on their site. This is another reason I use them as it seems that unlike many others out there, they really have nothing to hide.
When you compare their costs with other forms of traffic generation, look at it this way: It costs an average of $56,000 USD using pay-per-click to generate 100,000 visitors these days (which is a figure I pulled from an independent study), however uSocial can provide you with the same or better result with an investment of $200-$400. This is the main reason they've generated so much popularity and will continue to do so in the future.
The only negative I've ever experienced as a result of using uSocial's service is the fact that it takes them around 3 days to get to my orders once they're placed as they've got such a backlog of orders. It is worth the wait though and wait times have gotten a little better over the last few months.
I'd definitely recommend uSocial to anyone looking to get a fantastic return on their marketing investment. You may not like the fact that they're subverting social bookmarking sites, though if you really want to get ahead then I don't think you'll see it as much of an issue.
One of the main benefits of using uSocial over any of their competitors is simply that they discount their packs of votes depending on how many you buy -- the more purchased, the more you'll save. At the time of this writing, all of their competitors offered a flat rate no matter how many were purchased, meaning cost could soar for large campaigns.
Unlike a few of their competitors who are simply misleading when they guarantee you a front-page listing on Digg or another site (which is impossible due to the fact they'd need to control Digg's systems to do so), uSocial offer a votes guarantee and actually state their success rate of getting to the front page honestly on their site. This is another reason I use them as it seems that unlike many others out there, they really have nothing to hide.
When you compare their costs with other forms of traffic generation, look at it this way: It costs an average of $56,000 USD using pay-per-click to generate 100,000 visitors these days (which is a figure I pulled from an independent study), however uSocial can provide you with the same or better result with an investment of $200-$400. This is the main reason they've generated so much popularity and will continue to do so in the future.
The only negative I've ever experienced as a result of using uSocial's service is the fact that it takes them around 3 days to get to my orders once they're placed as they've got such a backlog of orders. It is worth the wait though and wait times have gotten a little better over the last few months.
I'd definitely recommend uSocial to anyone looking to get a fantastic return on their marketing investment. You may not like the fact that they're subverting social bookmarking sites, though if you really want to get ahead then I don't think you'll see it as much of an issue.
About the Author:
Want to check out uSocial.net and buy Diggs now? Click that link or you can click here to find out even more information about this awesome way of generating traffic.
Post a Comment